<--
.. title: Problem of the Week #3: Solution
.. date: 2010-12-15 02:01:00
.. tags: koalas, problem of the week, scott bakula
.. category: old
.. slug: problem-of-the-week-3-solution
.. author: Corky
.. has_math: true
-->


  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [![image](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_fa6AZDCsHnY/TPnT0ucqSUI/AAAAAAAAAHk/kOFxbYCSx1g/s200/koala.jpg)](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_fa6AZDCsHnY/TPnT0ucqSUI/AAAAAAAAAHk/kOFxbYCSx1g/s1600/koala.jpg)
  Cold-Blooded Killer
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello all and welcome to to another roundup of Problem of the Week. If
the time intervals don't seem to be adding up, just remember that "week"
is an illusion here at Virtuosi headquarters. "Problem of the Week,"
doubly so. But enough with the excuses, let's see if Mr. Bond lives to
Die Another Day. The situation presented in the problem was one of a
glass of water filled all the way to the top with a single ice cube in
it. The goal is to see if any water falls to the floor as the ice cube
melts. The simplest analysis would be to just consider the displacement
of water by the ice cube. By Archimedes' principle we know that the
buoyant force on the ice cube is equal to the weight of the water
displaced by the ice cube. But since the ice cube is floating, we know
that the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the ice cube.
Therefore, the ice cube just displaces it's own weight in water. So as
the ice cube melts, the water level stays the same and no water is
spilled over. Stated a bit more explicitly, we have that the buoyant
force is the weight of the displaced water: $$ F_b = m_{water}g =
{\rho}_{water}V_{water}g $$ where we have just expressed the mass of
the water as the density of water times the volume of the water
displaced. Likewise, the weight of the ice cube is $$ W_{ice} =
m_{ice}g = {\rho}_{ice}V_{ice}g $$ But since the ice cube is
floating, the buoyant force is equal to the weight. Setting the above
equations equal to each other and rearranging a bit, we can solve for
the volume of the water displaced by the ice cube: $$ V_{water} =
\frac{{\rho}_{ice}V_{ice}}{{\rho}_{water}} $$ Great, now we have
the volume of water that the ice cube displaced, so now we just need to
see what volume of water the ice cube will add once it melts. Since we
know that the mass of ice cube better be the same as the mass of the
water left after it melts, we can write $$ {\rho}_{ice}V_{ice} =
{\rho}_{water}V_{water} $$ which gives that the total volume of the
water is just
$$ V_{water} = \frac{{\rho}_{ice}V_{ice}}{{\rho}_{water}} $$
which is exactly the same volume we found before. Therefore, when the
ice cube melts it fills up exactly the same amount of volume as the
water displaced to hold up the ice cube, so the water level remains the
same and James Bond lives!
Or does he? Well, he sure does if the system is entirely described by
the analysis above. But we need to be exact here since a single drop
would set off the Koala death trap. We have considered the biggest
contributions to the change of volume of the water (and easiest to
calculate!), but we have ignored a large number of much much smaller
effects on the volume. Typically these effects would be swept aside and
callously labeled "negligible," but since even the smallest change of
volume could mean life or death for our hero, they must be accounted for
to give a final "exact" answer.
Unfortunately, "exact" isn't something science can do very well. We can
only do as good as the measurements we make allow. And since I gave you
practically no information, this was very tough. However, one could
consider the magnitude of the effects given typical values and see which
side wins out. But if two competing effects give similar values under
reasonable conditions, it becomes very difficult to give an answer.
The last two "Problems of the Week" were well posed math problems, each
with a clear-cut "correct" answer. This one was a physics problem and
physics is a lot messier than math. That may initially seem less
satisfying, but it means that there is a whole lot of interesting "mess"
to sort out! I really enjoyed reading the
[comments](http://thevirtuosi.blogspot.com/2010/11/problem-of-week-3.html#more)
detailing all the neat small effects to the change of volume that I
ignored in my solution. Density variations as a function of temperature,
surface tension effects, evaporation and thermal expansion all play some
role in determining the final answer. There's a whole lot of interesting
physics going on!
Without knowing the exact conditions a bit more and doing a whole lot
more work, it seems as though I will not be able to provide a final
physics solution. But, having seen just about every Bond movie, I can
give an answer with a certainty not afforded to me by science: Mr. Bond
lives. How do I know this? Well, it is common knowledge that James Bond
has tiny smoke grenades in the soles of his shoes that release a potent
koala knock-out potion specifically created by Q. So Bond releases these
into the koala death pit, rendering the vicious beasts harmless. Then he
uses his watch laser to cut any bindings Dr. Cherrycoke may have placed
him in, falling into the death pit. The fall leaves Mr. Bond uninjured,
as a cuddly mass of sleeping koalas break his fall. By stacking the
koalas into a rudimentary series of steps, Mr. Bond ascends out of the
death pit and free to save the world's ice supply from the evil Dr.
Cherrycoke.
Obviously.
